
- The digital agenda is imposed globally
- They consider modernization a mandatory change while falsely promoting it as optional and advisable
- World governments and corporations are deliberately coercing the adoption of digital tools
The United Nations Future Pact and the Global Digital Pact aim to foster international cooperation in AI ethics, data governance and equitable digital access. These initiatives are voluntary, not binding.
However, "volunteering" becomes mandatory when national governments adopt invasive digital methods as de facto policy plans.
This whole situation ends only for the benefit of corporations and institutions that contribute nothing, and that when they do it is to achieve greater control.
While more and more people in the world languish before a system that worsens exponentially with the dantesque digital agenda.
Of course most people around the world are blindly consumerist and are happy with their portable tombstones, sorry… the rectangular "smart" phones seeing all this digitization as a wonder thanks to the crushing propaganda.
Digital Coercion
Some experts have warned of this situation of digital coercion, the Special Rapporteur Philip Alston in his critical report on the "digital welfare state," Governments are increasingly using technology to provide services in a way that punishes those digitally excluded.
He described systems where people lose access to social benefits simply because they cannot navigate complex online portals, lack smartphones, or have no stable internet.
"The digital welfare state risks turning the state into a digital dystopia for millions of people," Alston said.
Technology should expand access, not restrict it. When the State makes digital participation a prerequisite for basic services, it shifts the burden to citizens, especially those less equipped to bear it.
"Automation, surveillance and digital gatekeeping threaten to erode human rights under the guise of progress."
Right to disconnect
Just as society recognized the need for physical accessibility - ramps, lifts, Braille signs - we must now recognize digital accessibility as a civil right.
But accessibility doesn't mean making everything digital. It means ensuring that no one is excluded from essential services because they exist outside the digital network.
This is why movements advocating the "right to disconnect" and the "right to life offline" are gaining ground globally. These are not called upon to reject technology - they are demands that technology serves people, not the other way around.
